AI Assessment

Know where AI pays off for you before you spend on it

Never used AI, started and stuck, or already running it: the assessment starts from what your business needs, then checks your environment is ready for it, and says what to do, in what order, at what cost.

A fixed-scope, fixed-price assessment, usually two to three weeks, ending in a prioritized plan you own outright.

The problem

Someone is proposing AI spend, or it is already happening, and nobody can say what it can reach, what it costs per person who actually uses it, or which use case to build first.

Where you are today

  • We have never used AI

    we start from the work itself: which tasks repeat, which of them a model is actually good at, and what you would have to license to begin

  • We started, and we are stuck

    licences are bought and something was built, but adoption stalled; we find out whether the obstacle is the tool, the data or the fact that nobody owns it

  • We use AI and want to go further

    it works and teams want more of it; we map what is already running, approved or not, and what it would take to widen it safely

What you get: quick wins

The automations that will do the most for your business, found, ranked and ready to build first.

  • Scoping note

    One page: which of the three situations you are in, and exactly what the assessment will cover.

  • Environment report

    What AI runs today, or what you would need to start, and whether your environment can carry it. It covers three things:

    Security
    the data any assistant or agent, in use or proposed, could reach, written down before anything is approved
    Cost
    licences you hold priced against who actually opens them, or the cost of beginning if you hold none
    Monitoring
    the number that will tell you each chosen build worked, agreed before it starts
  • Use-case map

    The repetitive tasks worth automating, found by the AI Automation Discovery Agent from your tools’ activity counts and interviews with your people. Each one is costed and scored on impact, feasibility, cost to run, and security. Not a generic shortlist.

    See the AI Automation Discovery Agent
  • Decision matrix

    Each use case placed in one of four groups, so the quick wins, the most impactful automations that are also easy to build, stand out. Presented to your decision-makers (sample below).

  • Prioritized plan and roadmap

    A dated plan that starts with the quick wins, and that you own outright whether or not we build it.

Something else in mind?Let’s talk

A sample of the result

The matrix your team decides from in the workshop: every use case scored on impact and feasibility, then sorted into four groups.

Impact × FeasibilitySample · invented use cases

Worth the work

High impact, harder to build

  • Contract clause review

    Impact 8 · Feasibility 4 · ~$420/mo

Quick wins

High impact, easy to build

  • Supplier invoice triage

    Impact 9 · Feasibility 8 · ~$180/mo

  • Meeting notes to actions

    Impact 7 · Feasibility 9 · ~$60/mo

Not now

Low impact, harder to build

  • Auto-written board reports

    Impact 3 · Feasibility 3 · ~$900/mo

Nice to have

Lower impact, easy to build

  • Staff policy Q&A

    Impact 4 · Feasibility 9 · ~$40/mo

  • Draft replies to routine email

    Impact 5 · Feasibility 8 · ~$30/mo

How we do it

  1. Scoping

    A short intake that establishes which situation you are actually in. The assessment is scoped differently for each, so this is the first thing we settle.

  2. Diagnosis

    A technical read of the tenant and the AI tooling, with licence and usage analysis, and a few interviews with the people who would use it. The AI Automation Discovery Agent runs them, and finds the repetitive tasks that feed the use-case map.

  3. Prioritization

    Your teams will name more candidates than you can fund. Each one is scored on the same four measures, so a request from finance and a request from operations can be compared on something other than who asked louder.

    • Impact
    • Feasibility
    • Cost to run
    • Security and governance
  4. Decision

    Scoring produces numbers; this turns them into a decision. Every candidate goes onto one impact-by-feasibility matrix, which sorts them into four groups — so you are arguing with a picture rather than a spreadsheet, before anyone commits budget.

    • Quick wins
    • Worth the work
    • Nice to have
    • Not now
  5. Workshop

    A working session around that matrix, where your team decides rather than receives a recommendation.

    • Who is in the room
    • What gets challenged
    • What gets decided

Find out what your AI is actually doing

A fixed scope at a published price, ending in a plan you own. Tell us which teams are using AI today and we will confirm what the assessment would cover.